The UK's leading contractor site. Trusted by over 100,000 monthly visitors

Search Results

You searched for 'ir35 compliant contract'. There were 3229 results in 7 categoriesOnly the first 250 are shown.

Modify:

Did you mean: IR compliant contract

Results within categories:

Results:

New IR35 ruling: Partial victory for JLJ Services v HMRC
Contractor John Spencer’s company JLJ Services failed to win its IR35 case outright against HMRC but reduced its £140,000 tax bill.
�Spencer’s company JLJ Services has won a partial IR35 victory in its four-year battle against HMRC. It� �ey facts of the case: IT contractor John Spencer, contracting via his own company JLJ Services, worked on contr� �cting via his own company JLJ Services, worked on contracts for client Allianz from 2000 to 2007 HMRC claimed� �n ruled that only the last four of the seven-year contract with client Allianz were inside IR35. Key facts o�

Category: News | Fri, 09 Dec 2011


Contractor avoids £141,000 tax bill with partial victory in IR35 tribunal ruling
Contractor John Spencer’s company JLJ Services failed to win its IR35 case outright, but IR35 was found to apply in only 4 of the 7 years in dispute.
�ven-year contract with client Allianz were inside IR35 . Spencer’s representative, accountant Neil Awber� �Key facts of the case IT contractor John Spencer, contracting via his own company JLJ Services, worked on contr� �cting via his own company JLJ Services, worked on contracts for client Allianz from 2000 to 2007 HMRC claimed� �n ruled that only the last four of the seven-year contract with client Allianz were inside IR35 . Spencer’s�

Category: News | Mon, 12 Dec 2011


Key facts overlooked in JLJ Services IR35 ruling: contractor ‘sets record straight’
Contractor John Spencer reveals in this exclusive interview with ContractorCalculator how key facts were overlooked in the JLJ Services IR35 ruling.
�Services tribunal ruling . This found him inside IR35 for four of the seven years under investigation b� �any use” was simply incorrect. Spencer was still contracting at Allianz during this period, but the nature of� �upplied information about my working patterns and contracts that did not feature at all in the ruling. There� �blance to those of an employee, and handed over a contract log that showed that his final year with client A�

Category: News | Wed, 14 Dec 2011


Contracting business Marlen Ltd. wins IR35 case against HMRC
Contractor Gary Hughes has won his IR35 case against HMRC, with the tribunal finding that his relationship with client JCB was not one of employment.
�ractorCalculator: “It was always our opinion that IR35 did not apply from the outset. The tribunal found� �hes and his client JCB within each of a series of contracts between JCB and Hughes’ contractor limited compan� �ntrol which would have been needed to establish a contract of employment just did not exist.” Nicola Smith o�

Category: News | Fri, 01 Jul 2011


Employment law case confirms precedents for contractor IR35 status
The results of a mainstream employment law case adds weight to case law when establishing contractor IR35 status with HMRC.
�A recent IR35 case has brought some welcome news to contractors� �ent law issue could have a positive impact on the contracting sector. JL Windows and Doors provides labour on a� �gnificant factor in determining the nature of the contracts.” This interpretation is worrying, because is see� �ark found that MOO did exist within each specific contract, but could not be used to ‘establish the nature o�

Category: News | Mon, 23 Feb 2009


Contractors’ clients can avoid litigation in IR35 cases like Dragonfly
Despite speculation of clients being sued in IR35 cases like the recent Dragonfly ruling, with no breach of contract clients avoid possible action.
�C evidence that implies the contracts were within IR35 are likely to be free of any resulting threat of� �ax bills by giving HMRC evidence that implies the contracts were within IR35 are likely to be free of any res� �vidence supplied by his client that indicated his contract was inside IR35. This was only one of many cases�

Category: News | Thu, 25 Sept 2008


Accountax tight-lipped on loss of key Dragonfly IR35 appeal
Accountax, retained by the PCG to defend the Dragonfly IR35 case, is tight-lipped on the loss of the appeal and the impact on contractors.
�its high-profile role in the Dragonfly Consulting IR35 defence, Accountax has been unwilling to speak on� �report their views. For now, though, many in the contracting sector appear to be in a state of shock.�

Category: News | Sat, 06 Sept 2008


Dragonfly ruling means HMRC calling the shots on IR35 and contractor status
Following the Dragonfly ruling, it is beginning to look like HMRC is ahead in its campaign to classify many contractors as employees.
�of Dragonfly Consulting’s and Jonathan Bessell’s IR35 appeal in the High Court , a shocked contracting� �ssell’s IR35 appeal in the High Court , a shocked contracting sector is starting to take stock of the implicati�

Category: News | Mon, 08 Sept 2008


An end to expense deductions for IR35-caught contractors?
A source close to the Treasury has told ContractorCalculator that HMRC is seriously considering cutting out the expenses deductions for IR35-caught contractors.
�nses deductions for contractors who are caught by IR35 . The source said that the move was provoked by a� �ld be yet another in the series of attacks on the contracting industry that began last year with the Managed Se� �growing use of structures, such as...overarching contracts of employment with employment businesses, to obta�

Category: News | Tue, 01 Apr 2008


Accountax win IR35 case for contractor
First Word Software Ltd won an IR35 case largely because it was very clearly in control of its own work.
�Important factors in this IR35 decision Control Mutuality of Obligtion Financial� �g , Neil Atkins, managing director of First Word, contracted through a Weybridge, Surrey agency called Plexus� �count, and faced financial risk in completing the contract for Plexus Personnel and Reuters. At times Plexus�

Category: News | Thu, 24 Jan 2008


Result page:  Previous   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   Next