The UK's leading contractor site. Trusted by over 100,000 monthly visitors

Search Results

You searched for 'ir35 compliant contract'. There were 3218 results in 7 categories .  Only the first 250 are shown.

Modify:

Did you mean: IR compliant contract

Results within categories:

Results:

Dragonfly decision could threaten IR35 defences for thousands of contractors
With the ruling by the High Court on the Dragonfly Consultancy Ltd. v HMRC case due shortly, a decision against the contractor Jon Bessell could threaten IR35 defences for tens of thousands of contractors.
�ound by the Special Commissioners to be inside of IR35 in January this year. Bessell, supported by the P� �eaten the defence offered by tens of thousands of contracts who might come under investigation. ContractorCal� �nd-user client when asked about substitution. The contract between Dragonfly and the agency DPP suggested co�
Category: News | Tue, 19 Aug 2008

Dragonfly verdict - “no massive additional exposure to IR35 risk”
Following analysis of the Dragonfly case, IR35 experts Qdos Consulting say that contractors should fear no major IR35 risk but must take action now.
�than Bessell of Dragonfly Consulting had lost his IR35 appeal in the High Court and faced a £99,000 tax� �g in expert colleagues to stay outside IR35 . Sub-contracting elements of their work to colleagues and absorbin� �ors must still take urgent action to ensure their contracts and working arrangement with clients are clear, a� �not overrule the implications of the hypothetical contract. Contractors should still take urgent action Acco�
Category: News | Wed, 10 Sept 2008

Only ‘reasonable care’ will help contractors avoid IR35 penalties
Guidance from HMRC places a greater regulatory and financial burden on contractors, who have to demonstrate ‘reasonable care’ in every contract.
�to avoid the contractor being found to be within IR35 . The new guidance applies to tax returns and doc� �ded by a range of specialist organisations in the contracting sector. Perhaps the time has now come when contra� �l have to take even greater care when negotiating contracts with their agents and clients. In future, every c� �expected that if a contractor does not get their contract reviewed for IR35 by an expert, they have not “ta�
Category: News | Wed, 24 Sept 2008

Crucial Dragonfly Consulting IR35 appeal has been lost
The contracting sector is reeling after Dragonfly’s John Bessell loses a crucial IR35 appeal at the High Court.
�A crucial IR35 test case for all contractors has been lost by Dr� �Bessell, leaving him with a huge tax bill and the contracting sector with an even bigger headache. Dragonfly Co� �put forward by Bessell’s defence team. ‘Notional Contracts’ The Treasury-proposed IR35 legislation has allow� �roved by HMRC to have been within IR35 during his contract with client The Automobile Association. Supported�
Category: News | Thu, 04 Sept 2008

CIOT tells contractors: ''IR35 doesn't work''
Richard Mannion, chairman of the Owner-Managed Businesses group at the Chartered Institute of Taxation, slams IR35 as being unworkable and calls for a new review of contractor tax issues.
�'' IR35 doesn't work. It is unmanageable, one of the wors�
Category: News | Wed, 02 Apr 2008

Inflexible clients driving contractors into IR35?
As a new survey by a major online job board highlights the IT sector’s poor record on flexible working, ContractorCalculator asks if this has contributed to contractors falling within IR35?
�not geared towards flexible working. And, as key IR35 factors such as control , part and parcel and rig� �rs into IR35, but may also be driving them out of contracting altogether. The survey run by theitjobboard.com –� �run by theitjobboard.com – a leading source of IT contracts and jobs – also reveals that IT workers rated fle� �arcel’ of a firm, then this suggests the notional contract is one of service; they are effectively an employ�
Category: News | Mon, 23 Jun 2008

No IR35 precedent set for contractors by island consultants case, experts say
The IR35 case lost by Island Consultants before HMRC Special Commissioners last week does not set a precedent that will change the way contractors operate, as experts agree.
�Experts agree that the IR35 case lost by the Stour, West Midlands-based Islan� �problem for Island Consultants. All Lawspeed IR35 contracts (as opposed to our standard contracts) that our c� �of specialist skills towards STW’s project. Each contract was time based, namely 3 months. I would say that�
Category: News | Tue, 24 Jul 2007

Tories should scrap IR35
The Economic Competitiveness Policy Group has proposed that the Tories should scrap IR35.
�on Conservative Party has today proposed scraping IR35 . This is an official statement by the Economic C�
Category: News | Fri, 17 Aug 2007

Contractors want to know whom they work for
The issues in James v. Greenwich will decide this and their determination is already changing the way IR35 claims are handled.
�within a week or so. Key To Employment Rights and IR35 ''This decision is crucial to determining whether� �ering parcels for Greenwich Council, but this was contracted for through an agency. James didn't get regular w� �f time is not by itself sufficient to mean that a contract of employment can or should be implied and this i�
Category: News | Mon, 05 Nov 2007

Contractor beats HMRC in IR35 case - Larkstar Data
Welsh contractor Larkstar has beaten down an IR35 attack from HMRC at the General Commissioners.
�contracting firm Larkstar Data Limited has won an IR35 case at the General Commissioners in January. Ala� �The Pontypool, Wales-based contracting firm Larkstar Data Limited has won an IR35 case a� �Automobile Association outside the context of the contract it originally engaged in,'' says Kell. ''There ar�
Category: News | Thu, 07 Feb 2008

Result page:  Previous   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   Next