The UK's leading contractor site. Trusted by over 100,000 monthly visitors

Search Results

You searched for 'ir35 compliant contract'. There were 3218 results in 7 categories .  Only the first 250 are shown.

Modify:

Did you mean: IR compliant contract

Results within categories:

Results:

Contractor ‘employment’ status clarified as Tilson ruling is overturned on appeal
Last year’s ruling granting contractor Andrew Tilson employment rights has been overturned, but with little impact on contractors’ IR35 cases.
�that the ruling will have little significance for IR35 cases, as he explains: “The [IR35] legislation al� �that Judge Smail was wrong to have dismissed the contracts as being a ‘sham’. Further weight behind the deci� �stom Transport were a sham, and that the notional contract was one of employment. According to Judge McMulle�
Category: News | Wed, 03 Feb 2010

Marlen IR35 case: contractor pursued by HMRC despite failing all key employment tests
Engineering contractor Phil Hughes failed all of the key tests of employment, as the full ruling of the Marlen Ltd v HMRC IR35 tax tribunal reveals.
�Hughes failed the key tests of employment in his IR35 case so convincingly that the tribunal Judge Lady� �ruling transcript . Yet despite this, Hughes, who contracts through his own limited company Marlen, was pursu� �ntrol which would have been needed to establish a contract of employment just did not exist. The appeal ther�
Category: News | Fri, 15 Jul 2011

JSA appeal future online limited IR35 decision
The JSA Group of Companies, the UK’s leading specialist accountants for contractors, has agreed to jointly fund an appeal against an IR35 decision.
�tances, the contract was considered to be outside IR35. The Inland Revenue claimed, retrospectively, tha� �Support Agency. Given all the circumstances, the contract was considered to be outside IR35. The Inland Rev�
Category: News | Mon, 21 Jun 2004

Should you use the inland revenue IR35 contract review service?
Discusses whether you should use the Inland Revenue contract review service.
�s that if you believe your contract is borderline IR35 then it isn’t really worth sending it in to the I� �same role, and only one of them passed IR35. The contracts were exactly the same. The first used a lawyer wh� �view by most contractors that if you believe your contract is borderline IR35 then it isn’t really worth sen�
Category: News | Thu, 01 Aug 2002

Employment rights claims more limited under James v Greenwich decision
A decision by the Court of Appeal has limited the ability of contractors to claim employment rights. Such claims will become exceptional under the new case law.
�clear that this decision will have any affect on IR35 . While the case law used in IR35 is the same as� �loyment rights when they are working under agency contracts. Contractor Needs To Show 'Good Reason' The case� �taking time off. James had worked under an agency contract with Greenwich Council for three years. James had�
Category: News | Wed, 06 Feb 2008

Landmark tribunal judgement tells us who is an employee
The UK Employment Appeal Tribunal in London has handed down a critical decision on the definition of a worker--it directly affects contractors who could be considered employees.
�ntants, does not alter that fact.'' Relevance for IR35 While the entire question of IR35 is not raised i� �uld employ right of substitution clauses in their contracts. The second issue is that of mutuality of obligat� �ntractual relationship or not. If it is, then the contract lies in the employment field..." Is the obligatio�
Category: News | Wed, 28 Feb 2007

Control issue dominates in IR35 victories
Contractors continue to win most IR35 court cases, showing the legislation itself is misconceived. PCG have gone far to prove this in case law. The Revenue is likely to take a similar beating over the MSC legislation.
�win the vast majority of court cases based around IR35. A similar beating is likely to be administered t� �d Comments David Royden, a lawyer specialising in contract law with Layton's Solicitors in Manchester: ''Of�
Category: News | Wed, 23 May 2007

Contractor loses IR35 appeal - substitution clause viewed as “window dressing”
Contractor loses IR35 appeal as the hypothetical contract says his relationship with the client was one of employment.
�The Revenue has overturned an IR35 appeal by Cardiff based Alternative Book Company� �he relationship was overwhelmingly of employment. Contracts No Protection Shepherd’s defence hinged on a rang� �ounds that the contractor, Keith Shepherd, had a ‘contract of service’ with his client and the relationship�
Category: News | Wed, 04 Jun 2008

Taxman’s tactics – what contractors should look out for when an IR35 investigation looms
You should avoid trying to deal with a tax inspection without the benefit of specialist help.
�to take on the might of HMRC single-handed in an IR35 ivestigation need to be aware of the risks, warns�
Category: Articles: IR35 | Tue, 15 Jul 2008

Contractors opting out of the Conduct of Employment Regulations: where do they stand?
Timing is everything when it comes to opting out of the Conduct of Employment Regulations. But in most cases opting out is the best course of action.
�tors problems, by automatically tipping them into IR35 . This means that most choose to opt out of the r� �ng out makes sense Contractors who work through a contracting limited company are not the kind of vulnerable ag� �e contractor fails to sign the opt-out before the contract starts, this invalidates the opt-out, potentially�
Category: Articles: Job Search | Wed, 18 Mar 2009

Result page:  Previous   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   Next