You searched for 'ir35 compliant contract'. There were 3218 results
in
7
categories
.
Only the first
250
are shown.
Modify:
Did you mean: IR compliant contract
Results within categories:
Guide [836]
News [2166]
Guide Index [150]
First Timers Guide [14]
Calculators [19]
Contractor Services [23]
Corporate Information [10]
Results:
Redwood: "we will turn back the clock entirely on IR35 and msc"
In an interview with ContractorCalculator, leading Conservative John Redwood announced a commitment to do away with both IR35 and managed service company legislation.
�Group announced a commitment to do away with both IR35 and the managed service company legislation . "Wh�
Category:
News
| Mon, 20 Aug 2007
IR35 avoidance: Staying outside if you go contracting for your former employer
When contracting for a former employer, you must prove your new relationship is different.
�face a very real threat of being found inside of IR35 , says Kate Cottrell of contractor IR35 consultan� �ible for a contractor to remain outside IR35 when contracting for a former employer, but they have to work that� �ment. In such cases, she is often asked to review contracts and the working practices to create a bespoke con� �ployer, or being asked to return immediately on a contract basis after redundancy, face a very real threat o�
Category:
Articles: IR35
| Thu, 08 Apr 2010
Contractors inside IR35 may be able to claim employment rights after landmark ruling
Having been judged an Alstom employee despite years of contracting, Andrew Tilson has paved the way to some IR35 contractors claiming employee rights.
�Some contractors within IR35 might be able to claim employment rights from the� �Employee rights for contractors within IR35? The contracting sector thought that the case for contractor emplo� �ies and of high value Was authorised to negotiate contracts on behalf of Alstom Had a company phone, computer� �ractor has been found to have employment rights.” Contract was ‘a sham’ Dennemont continues: “Even though th�
Category:
News
| Fri, 03 Jul 2009
Treasury targets construction contractors with false self-employment consultation
In a new consultation on ‘false self-employment’ released by HM Treasury, construction contractors face scrutiny that could impact on all contractors.
�, which may have an impact on the application of IR35 legislation . However, according to contracting s� �ation of IR35 legislation . However, according to contracting sector commentators, contractors genuinely in bus� �contractors wishing to retain their self-employed contracts and working arrangements will have to ensure thes� �s other workers to carry out operations under the contract and is responsible for paying them.” The consulta�
Category:
News
| Mon, 27 Jul 2009
IR35: MBF Design Services v HMRC – key facts from the case for contractors to note
HMRC’s weak position and less than scrupulous methods show it should never have brought its IR35 case against MBF Design Services.
�been completely exonerated of any liability under IR35 by a first-tier tax tribunal. The facts reveal th� �not a disguised employee of client Airbus and his contracts were found to be outside IR35. “The parties’ plai� �intermediaries GED-Sitec and Morson that put the contract well outside IR35. These included: A clause stati�
Category:
News
| Mon, 07 Feb 2011
Primary Path IR35 case: HMRC was predestined to lose case offering important lessons
Contractor Phil Winfield of Primary Path was so obviously a genuine contractor and outside IR35 that HMRC was bound to lose, shows the Judge’s ruling.
�ontractor Phil Winfield was so clearly outside of IR35 and genuinely running an IT business via his limi� �e was in place, mirrored by upper and lower level contracts, ie with the contractor’s client and agencies res� �y of obligation – Judge Sadler suggested that any contract which included a substitution clause is unlikely�
Category:
News
| Wed, 03 Aug 2011
Contracting business Marlen Ltd. wins IR35 case against HMRC
Contractor Gary Hughes has won his IR35 case against HMRC, with the tribunal finding that his relationship with client JCB was not one of employment.
�ractorCalculator: “It was always our opinion that IR35 did not apply from the outset. The tribunal found� �hes and his client JCB within each of a series of contracts between JCB and Hughes’ contractor limited compan� �ntrol which would have been needed to establish a contract of employment just did not exist.” Nicola Smith o�
Category:
News
| Fri, 01 Jul 2011
IR35 to be reinforced with PSC anti-avoidance measures from 2013
Contractors face new personal service company anti-avoidance measures in the 2013 Finance Bill according to the 2012 Budget.
�use of personal service companies and to make the IR35 legislation easier to understand for those who ar�
Category:
News
| Wed, 21 Mar 2012
HMRC team throws in towel on costly Atholl House IR35 case involving Kaye Adams
After 10 years and four hearings, HMRC finally gives up trying to prove Kaye Adams is a deemed employee under the IR35 legislation.
�ngly issuing Kaye Adams with a tax bill under the IR35 legislation. Despite fielding three barristers in� �ty and control are identified, if the rest of the contract and surrounding circumstances are inconsistent wi�
Category:
News
| Wed, 24 Jan 2024
Contracting direct with the client: advantages and disadvantages
Although most contracts are available only via agents, some contractors can work for the client direct, with both advantages and disadvantages.
�ct that is at a much reduced risk of being within IR35 . Disadvantages of contracting direct The biggest� �side risk that the direct relationship can bring. Contracting direct is not for every contractor, as good agent� �oy great benefits, such as much more control over contracts. However, there are pitfalls, and not being paid� �Contractors who have the opportunity to contract direct with their clients can enjoy great benefit�
Category:
Articles: Job Search
| Mon, 09 Feb 2009
Result page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 Next