The UK's leading contractor site. Trusted by over 100,000 monthly visitors

Search Results

You searched for 'ir35 compliant contract'. There were 3218 results in 7 categoriesOnly the first 250 are shown.

Modify:

Did you mean: IR compliant contract

Results within categories:

Results:

Redwood: "we will turn back the clock entirely on IR35 and msc"
In an interview with ContractorCalculator, leading Conservative John Redwood announced a commitment to do away with both IR35 and managed service company legislation.
�Group announced a commitment to do away with both IR35 and the managed service company legislation . "Wh�

Category: News | Mon, 20 Aug 2007


IR35 avoidance: Staying outside if you go contracting for your former employer
When contracting for a former employer, you must prove your new relationship is different.
�face a very real threat of being found inside of IR35 , says Kate Cottrell of contractor IR35 consultan� �ible for a contractor to remain outside IR35 when contracting for a former employer, but they have to work that� �ment. In such cases, she is often asked to review contracts and the working practices to create a bespoke con� �ployer, or being asked to return immediately on a contract basis after redundancy, face a very real threat o�

Category: Articles: IR35 | Thu, 08 Apr 2010


Contractors inside IR35 may be able to claim employment rights after landmark ruling
Having been judged an Alstom employee despite years of contracting, Andrew Tilson has paved the way to some IR35 contractors claiming employee rights.
�Some contractors within IR35 might be able to claim employment rights from the� �Employee rights for contractors within IR35? The contracting sector thought that the case for contractor emplo� �ies and of high value Was authorised to negotiate contracts on behalf of Alstom Had a company phone, computer� �ractor has been found to have employment rights.” Contract was ‘a sham’ Dennemont continues: “Even though th�

Category: News | Fri, 03 Jul 2009


Treasury targets construction contractors with false self-employment consultation
In a new consultation on ‘false self-employment’ released by HM Treasury, construction contractors face scrutiny that could impact on all contractors.
�, which may have an impact on the application of IR35 legislation . However, according to contracting s� �ation of IR35 legislation . However, according to contracting sector commentators, contractors genuinely in bus� �contractors wishing to retain their self-employed contracts and working arrangements will have to ensure thes� �s other workers to carry out operations under the contract and is responsible for paying them.” The consulta�

Category: News | Mon, 27 Jul 2009


IR35: MBF Design Services v HMRC – key facts from the case for contractors to note
HMRC’s weak position and less than scrupulous methods show it should never have brought its IR35 case against MBF Design Services.
�been completely exonerated of any liability under IR35 by a first-tier tax tribunal. The facts reveal th� �not a disguised employee of client Airbus and his contracts were found to be outside IR35. “The parties’ plai� �intermediaries GED-Sitec and Morson that put the contract well outside IR35. These included: A clause stati�

Category: News | Mon, 07 Feb 2011


Primary Path IR35 case: HMRC was predestined to lose case offering important lessons
Contractor Phil Winfield of Primary Path was so obviously a genuine contractor and outside IR35 that HMRC was bound to lose, shows the Judge’s ruling.
�ontractor Phil Winfield was so clearly outside of IR35 and genuinely running an IT business via his limi� �e was in place, mirrored by upper and lower level contracts, ie with the contractor’s client and agencies res� �y of obligation – Judge Sadler suggested that any contract which included a substitution clause is unlikely�

Category: News | Wed, 03 Aug 2011


Contracting business Marlen Ltd. wins IR35 case against HMRC
Contractor Gary Hughes has won his IR35 case against HMRC, with the tribunal finding that his relationship with client JCB was not one of employment.
�ractorCalculator: “It was always our opinion that IR35 did not apply from the outset. The tribunal found� �hes and his client JCB within each of a series of contracts between JCB and Hughes’ contractor limited compan� �ntrol which would have been needed to establish a contract of employment just did not exist.” Nicola Smith o�

Category: News | Fri, 01 Jul 2011


IR35 to be reinforced with PSC anti-avoidance measures from 2013
Contractors face new personal service company anti-avoidance measures in the 2013 Finance Bill according to the 2012 Budget.
�use of personal service companies and to make the IR35 legislation easier to understand for those who ar�

Category: News | Wed, 21 Mar 2012


HMRC team throws in towel on costly Atholl House IR35 case involving Kaye Adams
After 10 years and four hearings, HMRC finally gives up trying to prove Kaye Adams is a deemed employee under the IR35 legislation.
�ngly issuing Kaye Adams with a tax bill under the IR35 legislation. Despite fielding three barristers in� �ty and control are identified, if the rest of the contract and surrounding circumstances are inconsistent wi�

Category: News | Wed, 24 Jan 2024


Contracting direct with the client: advantages and disadvantages
Although most contracts are available only via agents, some contractors can work for the client direct, with both advantages and disadvantages.
�ct that is at a much reduced risk of being within IR35 . Disadvantages of contracting direct The biggest� �side risk that the direct relationship can bring. Contracting direct is not for every contractor, as good agent� �oy great benefits, such as much more control over contracts. However, there are pitfalls, and not being paid� �Contractors who have the opportunity to contract direct with their clients can enjoy great benefit�

Category: Articles: Job Search | Mon, 09 Feb 2009


Result page:  Previous   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   Next