Income shifting proposals: how contractors should cope

IR35 Test

The Treasury is determined to put a stop to what it calls income shifting in family companies. If you share dividends with your spouse, you will now have to base the proportion of dividends your spouse gets on the ''market value'' of the services the spouse provides.

Market Value Determination

  • Based on income actually contributed
  • Based on cost of third-party services
  • Based on list of roles
  • Based on time saved by one spouse for the other

How Will It Work?

How will it work? ''The short answer is that it will be very difficult to apply'' says Simon Sweetman, a tax consultant based in Felixstowe who works with the London-based Federation of Small Business. ''There is no clear-cut way to establish the market value of the services one person provides to another in a family company because the role that one person plays is hard to define.'' Sweetman gives the example of a spouse who drives the contractor to work every morning. ''Is that the same value as a taxi ride? Who can say?'' Sweetman points out.

What To Look For?

The example Sweetman gives provides a very clear way of seeing what's wrong with the proposal. But what can we do to establish market value?

Money Contributed?

''The most obvious way to establish market value is in terms of the money actually brought in to a company. But is that fair? In a large company, lots of employees don't actually contribute to the revenue stream. Why would that be different in a small company?''

Find Someone Similar?

We return to the example of the spouse who does the company website. You can look on the Web and see what it would cost if your website is done by a third party. You could then value your spouse's contribution in terms of that amount of income brought in, as Sweetman points out. But of course different Web site designers earn more or less income depending on how well skilled they are. You would have to value your spouse's contribution in terms of the equivalent service provider on the market. Again, it's difficult to say exactly how to do this, but it's a strategy.

''This is still not a precise answer, for there is none,'' Sweetman continues. ''Consider what happens if your spouse answers the telephone when you are not there,'' Sweetman says. ''Lots of people don't reply to voice mail. So having your spouse answer the phone could bring in additional business. That role should be valued accordingly, although one can't precisely say how much.''

Count Up Roles?

One could arguably count up all the different roles played by a spouse in the business. These could include, for example, driving the contractor to the work site, answering the phone, doing the books, helping the contractor with writing up reports, possibly even doing some of the same work the contractor is doing. Take each one, find a market value, however imprecise, and then add them up.

How Many Hours?

One other possibility would be to consider how many hours of work the contractor saves by having the spouse play various roles in the business. If your spouse does the books for you, how many hours of time does it take? If you had spent that time, you could value it at your hourly rate? Same would go for any letter-writing or reports that your spouse did for you.

Share Transfers

If all of this makes you want to throw up your hands, and just have your spouse sell you the shares in the company, you could go that route, although your spouse would then forego any dividend income. Sweetman explains that, unless your company has significant tangible assets like property or machinery, this could be done by giving a small notional value to the shares. It is almost impossible to establish market value for shares in a small private company for there is no liquid market in which to dispose of these shares.

Time and some nasty court cases will tell which of these approaches are to become established usage. They are all subjects to discuss with a professional, for above all, you should take advice in this matter which even the most skilled experts are uncertain about.

Published: Wednesday, December 12, 2007

© 2012 All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited. Please see our copyright notice. If you want to use any content you have seen on this site then please request our media pack and ask for details of our Content Licencing Service.

Technical-E


Readers Comments...

This article has 2 comments.

Comment on this articleComment on this article

Speech Bubble Added: Sat, 05 Jan 2008

I think in this case it's quite simple. In your mind, free up your wife to look after the children, and employ someone for the necessary hours (perhaps full-time) to do the other tasks. Surely you can put a figure on that? If your wife's salary is less than this, be prepared to tell the taxman why.
Then consider what percentage of the shares (i.e. bonus) you would give to your employee for their contribution to the company success. If less than half, be prepared to tell the taxman why your wife has more than her fair share.
There - what's so difficult about that??

Dave Willis, Solihull.

Recommended by 0 readers.

Sign in to recommend comments

View all readers comments View all readers comments.

Comment on this articleComment on this article


  
Bookmark and Share
  
     
  

Latest Site Updates

Project management contractor does it ‘by the book’, literally, to win first contract Project management contractor does it ‘by the book’, literally, to win first contract

Project management contractor Ken Burrell won his first contract, and just secured his first renewal, by acquiring & applying new contracting skills.

ContractorCalculator Market Report February 2012 ContractorCalculator Market Report February 2012

Contractors received a PR boost in Davos and have a target rich contract market if they can pick the winning sectors of the UK’s two-speed economy.

Plenty of rules for us; no rules for them Plenty of rules for us; no rules for them

Contractors could be forgiven for assuming HMRC only targets the public over tax avoidance, while the political elite are left to get on with it.

IR35, tax avoidance and Ed Lester: a potent mix threatening contractors’ livelihoods IR35, tax avoidance and Ed Lester: a potent mix threatening contractors’ livelihoods

Contractors are right to be worried by interim management contractor Ed Lester’s trial by media, because an unjustified backlash might be the result.


  
  

Twitter

  • HMRC extends anti-avoidance campaigns to construction trades and traders using new online search technology http://t.co/walUSlzX

    5 hours ago

  • Project management contractor does it ‘by the book’, literally, to win first contract http://t.co/8H4wfIhk

    13 hours ago

  • Contractor demand increased in January but billings down - a mismatch of demand and supply? REC/KPMG Report on Jobs http://t.co/E4npw1Q3

    13 hours ago

  • Contractor Newsletter, Issue 62: February 2012 http://t.co/SxRdnKm1

    Tue, 07 Feb 2012

  • It sounds glib, but a good start in reducing govt's gob-smacking costs (http://t.co/tzOGMPa1) would be to invest in pro interims/contractors

    Tue, 07 Feb 2012

  • £10.9bn of unpaid tax written off by government; Treasury failed to spot worrying trends http://t.co/7PKjoXVe via @NewStatesman

    Tue, 07 Feb 2012

Follow Us On Twitter


  
     

  
  

Contractor solutions

Contractors Handbook AM Limited ContractorCalculator Marketplace InniAccounts AWR Whitepaper IR35 Test
  
Contractor accountants - pricing checklist Contract jobs board
  

Contractor solutions

Contractors Handbook

The expert guide for UK contractors and freelancers

Bedouin Group

No more IR35. Retain up to 85% of your earnings.

Parasol Group

Umbrella or Limited? Guidance on best options, and take home pay.

InTouch Accounting

Person to person contractor accountant. £85 pcm. Free IR35 review

Choice Premier Pay+

Take home up to 85% of your pay. IR35 solution.

NA D J Colom Accountants Bedouin Group Contractor Financials NewsNow
  
Contractors Handbook

  

The UK's leading contractor site. Independently audited traffic (ABC) – 133,141 monthly unique visitors.