Leading conservative John Redwood slams income shifting proposals

IR35 Test

Conservative economic policy leader John Redwood roundly condemned the Treasury's proposals today on income shifting in an interview with ContractorCalculator.

Nasty Attack

''This is another nasty attack on small business,'' Redwood said. ''It is more of the same type of excessive regulation that we have seen in the past. Why shouldn't husbands and wives share income?''

Conservatives Would Change Law

Redwood committed the party to reforming the Treasury's position on income shifting. Redwood has also in the past, in an interview with ContractorCalculator, committed the party to reforming IR35 and the managed service company legislation--essentially to ''put back the clock,'' as Redwood puts it, removing all of the attacks on contractors that the Government has attempted in the past ten years.

What It Will Mean

Income shifting, according to the Treasury, takes place in a family company where one spouse--in theory--provides more value to the company than the other. By paying equal dividends to both spouses, the Treasury claims, the overall tax bill for the household is reduced. The Treasury seeks to put an end to this practice, according to its consultative document released yesterday,

This is another nasty attack on small business

John Redwood-Conservative Party

ContractorCalculator has determined that the income shifting measure, if applied, would increase contractor tax bills by about 40-50%.

The income shifting proposal has been attacked as unsound by a series of tax experts, including the London-based Institute of Chartered Accountants and the London-based Chartered Institute of Taxation. As the ICAEW points out, the difficulty is in determining what the market value of a spouse is to a business.

''The proposed income shifting rules are very widely drafted. They will catch many owner-managed businesses involving husbands and wives and other family members. The difficulty will be working out whether they are caught by the definition or not. This will lead to yet more uncertainty for many entrepreneurs, who are likely to have to spend much more time looking over their shoulders to see if HMRC will attack their structure,'' says ICAEW Technical Committee chairman Francesca Lagerberg.

Why should husbands and wives not share income

John Redwood-Conservative Party

What Contractors Should Do

Despite the total opposition of tax experts, this proposal will become law in the next few months. Fortunately, it's not retroactive, so it won't penalise you for what you've done in the past.

But contractors need to take some concrete steps. It is almost certain you will need to take professional advice, but before doing so, you may wish to clarify your position to give the advisor something to work with.

First, you should clearly define the roles you and your spouse play in the business. Find justification in published salary figures for that role; i.e., if you do the website, find a job ad that shows that doing a website is paid at a certain rate. Don't hesitate to do the same for all your work in the company; if you drive your spouse to work sites, find out what a taxi to the work site would cost and base your calculation on that. And if you have serious credentials for what you do in the company, i.e. if you are a qualified accountant and you do the books, you should charge much more than if you just do them. The law makes reference to the market rate for the job.

Yes, it all sounds a bit looney. And it is. But the law is the law, so we'll deal with it until someone changes it. Some of us will have to spend time in court defending our position. This is something that the current government clearly does not care about at all.

It breaks all the rules on a good tax.

Anne Redston-Institute of Chartered Accountants

Anne Redston, from the Institute of Chartered Accountants of England and Wales tax faculty, puts it in a nutshell: ''It breaks all the rules on a good tax, being neither simple, fair nor certain.''

Published: Friday, December 07, 2007

© 2012 All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited. Please see our copyright notice. If you want to use any content you have seen on this site then please request our media pack and ask for details of our Content Licencing Service.


Readers Comments...

This article has 2 comments.

Comment on this articleComment on this article

Speech Bubble Added: Wed, 20 Feb 2008

An alternative way to look at the "market rate" valuation of the spouse's contribution would be to look at what a company or employment agency would charge you to carry out administrative, accounting, marketing, phone answering, report writing or organisational services. Add into that calcuation the fact that your spouse knows and understands your business (most contractors and engineers would get a premium rate for expert knowledge of the sector).

Imagine all that cost rolled into one invoice to that company - that is the spouse's worth. I defy anyone to come up with a figure less than 50% of your turnover.

Brian Woolstone, Norwich.

Recommended by 0 readers.

Sign in to recommend comments

View all readers comments View all readers comments.

Comment on this articleComment on this article


  
Bookmark and Share
  
     
  

Latest Site Updates

Public sector contractors may be forced into PAYE under new ‘off-payroll’ rules Public sector contractors may be forced into PAYE under new ‘off-payroll’ rules

Limited company contractors with public sector clients are facing new ‘off-payroll’ rules that could force them into PAYE or out of work.

Choosing an online contractor accountant or accountancy software – checklist download Choosing an online contractor accountant or accountancy software – checklist download

Contractors can choose the online contractor accountant or accountancy software that suits the needs of their contracting business using this free che

The tax avoidance arms race is MAD: mitigation, avoidance and disclosure The tax avoidance arms race is MAD: mitigation, avoidance and disclosure

The tax mitigation arms race between HMRC and tax advisors leads to a never-ending cycle of mitigation, avoidance and disclosure, says David Colom.

Does HMRC even know where its ‘better administration of IR35’ target is? Does HMRC even know where its ‘better administration of IR35’ target is?

If contractors agree to trial HMRC’s new IR35 framework for 12 months, how are we going to measure if ‘better administration’ has been achieved?


  
  

Twitter

  • Public sector contractors may be forced into PAYE under new ‘off-payroll’ rules http://t.co/LksFe03G

    3 hours ago

  • Oil and gas contractors prospects looking positive following record breaking North Sea licensing round http://t.co/1oy3Wb4l

    3 hours ago

  • Choosing an online contractor accountant or accountancy software – checklist download http://t.co/Jv2aptCF

    12 hours ago

  • Will the new Enterprise Research Centre dedicated to SMEs recognise the role of contracting businesses in the economy? http://t.co/ACE31fIm

    Tue, 22 May 2012

  • HMRC defends it tax gap calculations claiming external estimates are misleading http://t.co/7RWvC7bq via @AccountancyAge

    Tue, 22 May 2012

  • The tax avoidance arms race is MAD: mitigation, avoidance and disclosure http://t.co/9q1WMPjD

    Tue, 22 May 2012

Follow Us On Twitter


  
     

  
  

Contractor solutions

Contractors Handbook AM Limited IR35 Test
  
Contractor accountants - pricing checklist
  

Contractor solutions

Parasol Group

Umbrella or Limited? Guidance on best options, and take home pay.

Contractors Handbook

The expert guide for UK contractors and freelancers

Bedouin Group

No more IR35. Retain up to 85% of your earnings.

InTouch Accounting

Person to person contractor accountant. Free IR35 review.

Choice Premier Pay+

Take home up to 85% of your pay. IR35 solution.

NA Bedouin Group D J Colom Accountants Contractor Financials NewsNow
  
Elevate

  

The UK's leading contractor site. Independently audited traffic (ABC) – 156,346 monthly unique visitors.