Contractor Doctor: If I sign a confidentiality agreement in my name am I inside IR35?

IR35 Test

Dear Contractor Doctor,

I’m a limited company contractor and I’ve just started work on a six-month IT contract with a new client. I had my contract checked for IR35 by a consultant and it received the all-clear.

But I’ve been working on the assignment for only a week and I’ve been asked by my client project manager to sign a confidentiality agreement, which has been drawn up to include me personally as the ‘other party’.

If the confidentiality agreement is in my name, and not the name of my company, does that put me inside IR35?

Thanks

Erin

Contractor Doctor says:

Assuming the agreement refers only to issues directly relating to confidentiality, signing a confidentiality agreement personally has no bearing on IR35 status. It is not unusual for an individual, rather than their business, to be named, although it is more common for the legal entity actually supplying the services to be the signatory of an agreement.

Confidentiality agreements, which can also be called secrecy or Non-Disclosure Agreements, or ‘NDAs’ for short, are standard commercial practice in many industries and suppliers are routinely expected to sign such agreements.

This is particularly true for those like consultants and contractors supplying services personally, but who are not employees of the client organisation and therefore not bound by employment contracts.

Clients can’t change contractual terms, in theory

Technically, the timing of Erin’s client’s request to sign the confidentially agreement could be challenged, as clients cannot change terms and conditions once the contract has been signed, unless they re-negotiate with the contractor.

So, for example, if the client demanded that the contractor signed the confidentiality agreement or the contract would be terminated, then if this provision was not included in the original contract signed by both parties then the contractor could refuse.

However, contractors must weigh up the options and consider the circumstances. It could be that the client itself has a new client that requires all sub-contractors to personally sign secrecy agreements, and if there is no downside for the contractor to sign, they would generate considerable goodwill with their client if they agreed.

Check that confidentiality is all that is included

Contractors asked to sign a confidentiality agreement should check carefully that the agreement only covers matter relating to confidentiality and that there are no clauses that conflict with or attempt to supersede the main contract.

It is particularly important that the confidentiality agreement contains no references to control, the right of substitution or other factors relating to IR35 rules and employment status. Under these circumstances IR35 could become an issue, and if in doubt contractors should seek professional assistance.

Clients cannot change terms and conditions mid-contract without requesting the contractor’s cooperation to re-negotiate. So if there are any clauses that, for example, attempt to withhold payment or enforce some form of financial bond or penalty, they should be struck out or a completely new contract negotiated.

Confidentiality agreements should be in proportion

Some confidentiality agreements can impose excessive conditions upon signatories, such as including a very broad scope of work, like code routines, designs or know-how which are the intellectual property of the contractor, or are for an excessively long period.

If the conditions appear excessively onerous, then contractors should challenge them, negotiate them out, reduce them, or ask a professional to review the agreement.

If the conditions appear excessively onerous, then contractors should challenge them, negotiate them out, reduce them, or ask a professional to review the agreement

A confidentiality agreement is not the same as a restrictive covenant imposed by an agency. All things being equal, the agency can quite justifiably require that the contractor does not go direct to the client and cut out the agency.

A client may also have a legitimate right to require that a contractor does not go and work for competitors for a period of time after a contract, but only if the contractor agrees to such an imposition. In a highly specialised field where only a few clients exist, such a requirement might be unreasonable in a confidentiality agreement.

Good luck with your contracting!

Contractor Doctor

Published: Wednesday, February 02, 2011

© 2012 All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited. Please see our copyright notice. If you want to use any content you have seen on this site then please request our media pack and ask for details of our Content Licencing Service.


Readers Comments...


  
Bookmark and Share
  
     
  

Latest Site Updates

The tax avoidance arms race is MAD: mitigation, avoidance and disclosure The tax avoidance arms race is MAD: mitigation, avoidance and disclosure

The tax mitigation arms race between HMRC and tax advisors leads to a never-ending cycle of mitigation, avoidance and disclosure, says David Colom.

Does HMRC even know where its ‘better administration of IR35’ target is? Does HMRC even know where its ‘better administration of IR35’ target is?

If contractors agree to trial HMRC’s new IR35 framework for 12 months, how are we going to measure if ‘better administration’ has been achieved?

ContractorCalculator: Contracting news in brief - 18/May/2012 ContractorCalculator: Contracting news in brief - 18/May/2012

News this week includes the latest IR35 insights; P35 advice; contractor demand data; partial financial sector recovery; & HMRC service improvements.

P35 guidance: unsure contractors should answer ‘no’ to service co question, says HMRC P35 guidance: unsure contractors should answer ‘no’ to service co question, says HMRC

Contractors are not legally obliged to answer the P35 question 6, ‘Are you a Service Company?’, and if they’re unsure should answer ‘no’.


  
  

Twitter

  • Will the new Enterprise Research Centre dedicated to SMEs recognise the role of contracting businesses in the economy? http://t.co/ACE31fIm

    17 hours ago

  • HMRC defends it tax gap calculations claiming external estimates are misleading http://t.co/7RWvC7bq via @AccountancyAge

    19 hours ago

  • The tax avoidance arms race is MAD: mitigation, avoidance and disclosure http://t.co/9q1WMPjD

    22 hours ago

  • Does HMRC even know where its ‘better administration of IR35’ target is? http://t.co/L3MuqlFz

    Mon, 21 May 2012

  • IT leads surge in Scottish contract recruitment : Bank of Scotland Report on Jobs http://t.co/QIrLKFGb

    Mon, 21 May 2012

  • How might government's 'secret plan' to link civil service earnings to location affect public sector contractor rates? http://t.co/fJClb0HG

    Sun, 20 May 2012

Follow Us On Twitter


  
     

  
  

Contractor solutions

Contractors Handbook AM Limited IR35 Test
  
Contractor accountants - pricing checklist
  

Contractor solutions

Parasol Group

Umbrella or Limited? Guidance on best options, and take home pay.

Contractors Handbook

The expert guide for UK contractors and freelancers

Bedouin Group

No more IR35. Retain up to 85% of your earnings.

InTouch Accounting

Person to person contractor accountant. Free IR35 review.

Choice Premier Pay+

Take home up to 85% of your pay. IR35 solution.

NA Bedouin Group D J Colom Accountants Contractor Financials NewsNow
  
Elevate

  

The UK's leading contractor site. Independently audited traffic (ABC) – 156,346 monthly unique visitors.