IR35 case study 2 - a contractors IR35 story

IR35 Test

We have received many emails recently from contractors who have had both good and bad stories to tell about trying to resolve IR35 in their own circumstances. We thought I'd put them on this site....

If you have a good/bad story that you believe can help others out, then please let us know and we'll publish it.

Here's the first one......

I have just started a new contract (April 10) and went through XXXX Ltd. I was not very happy with the result though.

I was assured the company had a legal team that would ensure I got a customised contract before I agreed to take the to take the role on that basis (I had two other offers to choose from at thetime). 

When I turned up to sign the agency contract I found it was a very thinly disguised standard contract ("contractor" changed to "Service Provider", "timesheet" changed to "worksheet") and a substitution clause added. What's more the assignment schedule quoted a standard working commitment of 37.5 hours and a fixed 12 week length, a 28 day notice period and went on to say that the assignment schedule overrode anything it conflicted with in the contract.

Considerable negotiations followed, I offered to pay a lawyer for a customised contract, they offered to change a few more non-critical words to different synonyms etc. The frustrating thing was the client would have been happy to see a contract that was project based, like the work. They don't like the idea that I can walk out after twelve weeks even if the project isn't finished anymore than I do.

The agency put all the blame on the client saying they were the ones who were inflexible when I know this wasn't the case. The agency put a very good face on everything, was helpful to a point and found me a good contract, but it seems there strategy is to spend all there time and effort talking contractors out of anything that alters there standard contract rather than putting that effort towards a constructive attempt to alleviate the problem where possible.

Anyway after a couple of days of trying to make some headway I went ahead with it anyway. (Actually I rang one of the other offers, a permanent role, I was going to avoid the hassle altogether, but my contact was away that day). As it happens the contract was lucrative enough that I can treat it as a fail-IR35 anyway but the frustrating thing is if the agency wasn't involved I would have negotiated pass-IR35 working conditions without any problems.

After this experience I have decided I don't need the middle-men anymore. Next time I am going to buy/develop my own contract with a lawyer and target clients directly. That is the thing, more than any other, that will make my company a business and not a disguised employee anyway.

[IR35Calc:Moral of the story - trust no-one. It is a real shame that their are some agencies out there with no integrity who tarnish the reputation of the ones that are actually okay.]

Published: Wednesday, April 26, 2000

© 2012 All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited. Please see our copyright notice. If you want to use any content you have seen on this site then please request our media pack and ask for details of our Content Licencing Service.


Readers Comments...


  
Bookmark and Share
  
     
  

Latest Site Updates

The tax avoidance arms race is MAD: mitigation, avoidance and disclosure The tax avoidance arms race is MAD: mitigation, avoidance and disclosure

The tax mitigation arms race between HMRC and tax advisors leads to a never-ending cycle of mitigation, avoidance and disclosure, says David Colom.

Does HMRC even know where its ‘better administration of IR35’ target is? Does HMRC even know where its ‘better administration of IR35’ target is?

If contractors agree to trial HMRC’s new IR35 framework for 12 months, how are we going to measure if ‘better administration’ has been achieved?

ContractorCalculator: Contracting news in brief - 18/May/2012 ContractorCalculator: Contracting news in brief - 18/May/2012

News this week includes the latest IR35 insights; P35 advice; contractor demand data; partial financial sector recovery; & HMRC service improvements.

P35 guidance: unsure contractors should answer ‘no’ to service co question, says HMRC P35 guidance: unsure contractors should answer ‘no’ to service co question, says HMRC

Contractors are not legally obliged to answer the P35 question 6, ‘Are you a Service Company?’, and if they’re unsure should answer ‘no’.


  
  

Twitter

  • Will the new Enterprise Research Centre dedicated to SMEs recognise the role of contracting businesses in the economy? http://t.co/ACE31fIm

    5 hours ago

  • HMRC defends it tax gap calculations claiming external estimates are misleading http://t.co/7RWvC7bq via @AccountancyAge

    6 hours ago

  • The tax avoidance arms race is MAD: mitigation, avoidance and disclosure http://t.co/9q1WMPjD

    10 hours ago

  • Does HMRC even know where its ‘better administration of IR35’ target is? http://t.co/L3MuqlFz

    Mon, 21 May 2012

  • IT leads surge in Scottish contract recruitment : Bank of Scotland Report on Jobs http://t.co/QIrLKFGb

    Mon, 21 May 2012

  • How might government's 'secret plan' to link civil service earnings to location affect public sector contractor rates? http://t.co/fJClb0HG

    Sun, 20 May 2012

Follow Us On Twitter


  
     

  
  

Contractor solutions

Contractors Handbook AM Limited IR35 Test
  
Contractor accountants - pricing checklist
  

Contractor solutions

Choice Premier Pay+

Take home up to 85% of your pay. IR35 solution.

Contractors Handbook

The expert guide for UK contractors and freelancers

Parasol Group

Umbrella or Limited? Guidance on best options, and take home pay.

InTouch Accounting

Person to person contractor accountant. Free IR35 review.

Bedouin Group

No more IR35. Retain up to 85% of your earnings.

NA D J Colom Accountants Bedouin Group Contractor Financials NewsNow
  
Elevate

  

The UK's leading contractor site. Independently audited traffic (ABC) – 156,346 monthly unique visitors.