Handling unfair termination when contracting

IR35 Test

When a project doesn't go well, contractors are often blamed for the problems, even when they are not their fault. This can lead to unfair termination, when the client or the agency simply blames you and puts an early end to your contract.

Blaming the Contractor Is Easy

But there are other causes that can lead to unfair termination. A client can find that the original budget for a project has been drastically reduced, or that the original objectives have been changed. Your manager is now stuck with finding a way to make everything right, and blaming the contractor can provide an easy way out for it all.

What Are Your Rights?

So the manager calls you into the office, and says: ''You've made a right mess of this project, and you're fired.'' What can you do?

If you've done the work, and you are being falsely accused, you have a right to compensation for unfair dismissal. This should include payment for at least part of the contract time remaining, as well as any other damages you may have suffered.

If you are going to enforce your legal rights, you need to compile a dossier of proof

Jonathon Little-Jones Day

The Strategy

The trick is proving what you've done. The best strategy is to pull together the best dossier of proof that you can, so that when your manager accuses you of making a 'right mess,' you can say: 'Not only is that statement entirely false, but I can prove it. And if you don't change your tune, my lawyer will call the tune in court with a demand for compensation.''

Very often a simple demonstration of strength on your part will make the manager think twice, or at least get the manager to see that a compromise on this with you is desirable. Because if you are obliged to go to law, the issue will be the subject of a complex debate--and when lawyers say 'complex' they mean 'costly.'

Keep Good Records

"If you are going to be able to enforce your legal rights, you will need documentary proof compiled as completely as possible,'' says Jonathon Little, a partner specialising in contract law with the London-based firm Jones Day. ''You should also ask fellow contractors to write statements on your behalf, and you should create a chart of progress, a kind of 'before and after' scenario.''

This is not as daunting as it sounds.

First of all, you should have been careful throughout the project to document what you've done. Keep all emails, indications of milestones reached or phases completed, and as many records of your work as you can.

Get as many of your colleagues on the project as you can to support you. If you are all being victimised in a group, that's good. Your combined testimony will be all that more damaging. Each one should write his own version of what happened and you should all compare notes.

Use your own technical knowledge to explain what happened. You know what you were hired to do, and what the project was for. In the chart, try to explain how things were at the start, what you did, and what was left to be accomplished. Use plain language. If the project's failure was due to negligence on the part of the client, explain what the client should have done and didn't do. Did the client fail to provide necessary materials? Were you given access to everything you needed?

Make the most convincing case you can. Then take it first to the highest-level manager you can reach, and lay out the case. Give them a good scare. If necessary, you could consider paying the lawyers to contact them and help in the scare. That won't cost too much.

Hopefully, that will get you at least part of what you deserve. ''These claims are difficult to prove in court, so if you can get a decent settlement out of court, you should consider yourself ahead,'' Little adds.

These claims are difficult to prove in court, so if you can get a decent settlement out of court, you should consider yourself ahead

Jonathon Little-Jones Day

It is of course frustrating to know that you are in the right but to accept less than all that you are owed. And, if the client refuses to negotiate, you should go ahead with the lawsuit if you've put sufficient proof together. But the best strategy is to get a reasonable settlement and to move on. Years of legal frustration should be avoided if possible, even if you know you'll win in the end.

Published: Wednesday, May 14, 2008

© 2012 All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited. Please see our copyright notice. If you want to use any content you have seen on this site then please request our media pack and ask for details of our Content Licencing Service.


Readers Comments...


  
Bookmark and Share
  
     
  

Latest Site Updates

The tax avoidance arms race is MAD: mitigation, avoidance and disclosure The tax avoidance arms race is MAD: mitigation, avoidance and disclosure

The tax mitigation arms race between HMRC and tax advisors leads to a never-ending cycle of mitigation, avoidance and disclosure, says David Colom.

Does HMRC even know where its ‘better administration of IR35’ target is? Does HMRC even know where its ‘better administration of IR35’ target is?

If contractors agree to trial HMRC’s new IR35 framework for 12 months, how are we going to measure if ‘better administration’ has been achieved?

ContractorCalculator: Contracting news in brief - 18/May/2012 ContractorCalculator: Contracting news in brief - 18/May/2012

News this week includes the latest IR35 insights; P35 advice; contractor demand data; partial financial sector recovery; & HMRC service improvements.

P35 guidance: unsure contractors should answer ‘no’ to service co question, says HMRC P35 guidance: unsure contractors should answer ‘no’ to service co question, says HMRC

Contractors are not legally obliged to answer the P35 question 6, ‘Are you a Service Company?’, and if they’re unsure should answer ‘no’.


  
  

Twitter

  • Will the new Enterprise Research Centre dedicated to SMEs recognise the role of contracting businesses in the economy? http://t.co/ACE31fIm

    4 hours ago

  • HMRC defends it tax gap calculations claiming external estimates are misleading http://t.co/7RWvC7bq via @AccountancyAge

    6 hours ago

  • The tax avoidance arms race is MAD: mitigation, avoidance and disclosure http://t.co/9q1WMPjD

    9 hours ago

  • Does HMRC even know where its ‘better administration of IR35’ target is? http://t.co/L3MuqlFz

    Mon, 21 May 2012

  • IT leads surge in Scottish contract recruitment : Bank of Scotland Report on Jobs http://t.co/QIrLKFGb

    Mon, 21 May 2012

  • How might government's 'secret plan' to link civil service earnings to location affect public sector contractor rates? http://t.co/fJClb0HG

    Sun, 20 May 2012

Follow Us On Twitter


  
     

  
  

Contractor solutions

Contractors Handbook AM Limited IR35 Test
  
Contractor accountants - pricing checklist
  

Contractor solutions

Choice Premier Pay+

Take home up to 85% of your pay. IR35 solution.

Contractors Handbook

The expert guide for UK contractors and freelancers

Parasol Group

Umbrella or Limited? Guidance on best options, and take home pay.

InTouch Accounting

Person to person contractor accountant. Free IR35 review.

Bedouin Group

No more IR35. Retain up to 85% of your earnings.

NA D J Colom Accountants Bedouin Group Contractor Financials NewsNow
  
Elevate

  

The UK's leading contractor site. Independently audited traffic (ABC) – 156,346 monthly unique visitors.