Contractor Doctor: Client wants to move me to a new project. I don’t want to. Help!

IR35 Test

Dear Contractor Doctor,

I am an IT contractor, working through my own limited company, about two thirds of the way through a contract with a major financial institution.

The client wants to move me from my current contract with one of its businesses onto a brand new contract with another business. As well as changing my contract, the client wants to refocus it, taking a different approach from the project specification in my original contract; surely this might affect my IR35 status?

My client wants me on a new project and I’m not interested. Help!

Thanks

Anwar

Contractor Doctor says:

Contractors don’t get employment rights because they offer their services on a business-to-business basis to end-user clients. But contractors do receive protection under contract law, as long as they are prepared to exert it.

The bottom line is, there is no legal requirement for the contractor to move contracts and start a new project. Without the contractor’s agreement, a client cannot simply decide part-way through a contract to unilaterally change contract terms, such as the specific outcome that the contractor must achieve.

And, as Anwar rightly points out, for a client to be able to tell a contractor to do something different, it gives all the appearances of the client ‘controlling’ the contractor. Control is a key test of employment and could place the contractor inside IR35 and liable for additional income tax and National Insurance Contributions (NICs).

Time for contract renegotiation or notice?

A contractor would be entirely within their rights to respond to a client request to change company and job specification by indicating that they would prefer to continue with the contract as it is.

If the client says this is not possible, which is quite likely in this situation, then the contractor can choose to negotiate a new contract with the client, or request that their current contract is terminated by the client with notice.

There is no legal requirement for the contractor to move contracts and start a new project

Of course, this might upset the client and so, in the interests of not burning bridges with a client who may provide future assignments, an option might be for the contractor to compromise and suggest a reduced notice period.

It is possible that the client could be requesting a change of approach, rather than a whole new project outside of the original project scope, but the contractor needs to make that judgement call based on what is written in the original contract and what the client is asking the contractor to do now.

IR35 test of employment – control

If the contractor’s contract is being changed to reflect how the contractor should perform the services, this potentially flags the contractor as a ‘disguised employee’ on two counts, because:

  • The contractor is taking direction from the client, has accepted a new contract with new conditions, and is being moved from project to project on the client’s say-so
  • The contractor is being controlled by the client telling them exactly how to perform their duties by requesting a new approach, which is not the behaviour of a skilled independent contracting expert, but of an employee.

This is likely to be seen by HMRC as clear evidence that the contractor is controlled by the client, and therefore inside IR35.

IR35 test of employment – mutuality of obligation (MOO)

Another danger of a contractor happily going along with any changes a client might make is that it could infer mutuality of obligation, where an employer is obliged to provide work and an employee is obliged to take it.

As with ‘control’, if the taxman believes there is mutuality of obligation, the conclusion is likely to be that the contractor is a disguised employee who is inside IR35 and who should be taxed accordingly.

Record-keeping now could help avoid a future full-blown tax inspection

The fact that in this case the contractor, Anwar, is planning to resist the client’s efforts to control him is a positive point. But this should be followed through and all emails, meeting notes and any other evidence of how the situation is handled and ultimately resolved must be filed away in case of future investigation by HMRC.

Ultimately, contractors are not employees and so are not subject to the control and direction of their clients. But successful contractors must balance being flexible to clients’ requirements with maintaining their independent status outside IR35.

Good luck with your contracting!

Contractor Doctor

Published: Monday, October 25, 2010

© 2012 All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited. Please see our copyright notice. If you want to use any content you have seen on this site then please request our media pack and ask for details of our Content Licencing Service.


Readers Comments...


  
Bookmark and Share
  
     
  

Latest Site Updates

P35 guidance: unsure contractors should answer ‘no’ to service co question, says HMRC P35 guidance: unsure contractors should answer ‘no’ to service co question, says HMRC

Contractors are not legally obliged to answer the P35 question 6, ‘Are you a Service Company?’, and if they’re unsure should answer ‘no’.

No certainty from HMRC’s new IR35 framework, but the policy debate must be sustained No certainty from HMRC’s new IR35 framework, but the policy debate must be sustained

No certainty for limited company contractors yet, but the policy debate is far from over, say OTS Tax Director John Whiting and PCG’s Simon McVicker.

IR35 certainty for contractors? So close and, perhaps, not so far IR35 certainty for contractors? So close and, perhaps, not so far

Contractors are very close to enjoying a potential three-year rolling’ IR35 amnesty’ if we keep our nerve and help HMRC improve its new test regime.

“Keep calm and contract on”, IR35 experts tell contractors following HMRC’s new tests “Keep calm and contract on”, IR35 experts tell contractors following HMRC’s new tests

It’s IR35 business as usual for contractors – IR35 experts Andy Vessey of Qdos and Kate Cottrell of Bauer & Cottrell respond to the new HMRC tests.


  
  

Twitter

  • P35 guidance: unsure contractors should answer ‘no’ to service co question, says HMRC http://t.co/6cTwm45w

    2 hours ago

  • UK unemployment falls by 45000 in the three months to Match: ONS Labour Market Statistics: http://t.co/TirSQ6ai

    Wed, 16 May 2012

  • Manufacturers urge government to offer more support to the sector: BDO survey http://t.co/73Z9AUFz via @BBCNews

    Wed, 16 May 2012

  • No certainty from HMRC’s new IR35 framework, but the policy debate must be sustained http://t.co/idtjsXEj

    Wed, 16 May 2012

  • IR35 certainty for contractors? So close and, perhaps, not so far http://t.co/8v7LDXcI

    Tue, 15 May 2012

  • Financial sector jobs at six-month high: Morgan McKinley London Employment Monitor April 2012 http://t.co/8qbyoEje

    Mon, 14 May 2012

Follow Us On Twitter


  
     

  
  

Contractor solutions

Contractors Handbook AM Limited IR35 Test
  
Contractor accountants - pricing checklist
  

Contractor solutions

Bedouin Group

No more IR35. Retain up to 85% of your earnings.

Choice Premier Pay+

Take home up to 85% of your pay. IR35 solution.

Contractors Handbook

The expert guide for UK contractors and freelancers

InTouch Accounting

Person to person contractor accountant. Free IR35 review.

Parasol Group

Umbrella or Limited? Guidance on best options, and take home pay.

NA Bedouin Group D J Colom Accountants Contractor Financials NewsNow
  
Elevate

  

The UK's leading contractor site. Independently audited traffic (ABC) – 156,346 monthly unique visitors.