Contractor Doctor: Can my agent withhold £10k based on 17-year-old restrictions?

IR35 Test

Dear Contractor Doctor,

I’ve contracted with the same client for 17 years via the same agency, negotiating all the renewals myself, each of which has lasted varying periods of time. The client recently offered me a permanent role, which I have accepted.

However, by accepting permanent employment with my client, I’ve apparently breached a clause in the original agency contract. As a result, my agency has told me it will withhold £10,000 from my last invoice because of the breach.

Does the 17-year-old restriction clause still apply, preventing me from contracting direct, and can my agency withhold £10,000 as a result?

Thanks

Leon

Contractor Doctor says:

“Even if the contract is 17 years old, there is no reason that the original contract will not remain in force unless it has been changed, possibly at the time of one of the contract renewals,” explains Roger Sinclair of contractor legal specialist Egos. “However, if it has not been amended, it will still (at least in principle) be in force, and so the restriction clause in the original agency contract should be closely examined to determine exactly what the legal position is.

“Since the contract pre-dates the Conduct of Employment Agencies and Employment Businesses Regulations, we should consider whether they apply.”

Conduct regulations could apply by default

According to Sinclair, the transitional provisions of Conduct of Employment Agencies and Employment Businesses Regulations 2003 as they relate to limited companies came into force on 6 July 2004, which was after the contractor, Leon, signed his contract with the agency.

He explains: “As the contractor was working through a company before the Regulations came into force, and assuming no breaks whilst he was not working under this contract, then the contractor would appear to be covered by the regulations by default.

“It seems to me that he could not have opted out, because to be effective, notice of intention to opt out would have to have been given before he had been introduced or supplied to the client – ie before 1995 - at which point the regulations, which were driven by Europe, weren’t even a glimmer in an EU Commissioner’s eye.”

The Conduct Regulations state that a contractor cannot be subject to any detriment on the grounds that they take up employment with the client after the end of the contract. This means that the agency’s restrictive clause would have been unlawful and unenforceable since 2004.

“Furthermore assuming the Conduct Regulations do apply, then regulation 12 of the legislation applies, and prevents the agency from withholding money from the contractor. That means the agency’s declared intention to withhold £10,000 from the contractor would also be unlawful.”

But has the contract been continuous over 17 years?

In Sinclair’s experience, examples of contractors who cannot have opted out, and whose contracts are therefore subject to the Conduct Regulations because their contract pre-dates when the regulations came into force in 2004 are unsurprisingly now rarely encountered.

As the contractor was working through a company before the Regulations came into force, and assuming no breaks whilst he was not working under this contract, then the contractor would appear to be covered by the regulations by default

Roger Sinclair, Egos

“Upon a closer examination of the contract and renewals paperwork trail, it may become apparent that the contract is, in fact, not continuous; for example, there may be gaps. So it is possible that the contractor appeared to have opted out in the past, perhaps without fully understanding the implications.”

Sinclair urges contractors finding themselves in the unusual position of having a continuous contract which pre-dates the Conduct Regulations to check their contract records carefully if they do find themselves in dispute with their agency over restrictive clauses.

Good luck with your contracting!

Contractor Doctor

Published: Tuesday, January 24, 2012

© 2012 All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited. Please see our copyright notice. If you want to use any content you have seen on this site then please request our media pack and ask for details of our Content Licencing Service.


Readers Comments...


  
Bookmark and Share
  
     
  

Latest Site Updates

P35 guidance: unsure contractors should answer ‘no’ to service co question, says HMRC P35 guidance: unsure contractors should answer ‘no’ to service co question, says HMRC

Contractors are not legally obliged to answer the P35 question 6, ‘Are you a Service Company?’, and if they’re unsure should answer ‘no’.

No certainty from HMRC’s new IR35 framework, but the policy debate must be sustained No certainty from HMRC’s new IR35 framework, but the policy debate must be sustained

No certainty for limited company contractors yet, but the policy debate is far from over, say OTS Tax Director John Whiting and PCG’s Simon McVicker.

IR35 certainty for contractors? So close and, perhaps, not so far IR35 certainty for contractors? So close and, perhaps, not so far

Contractors are very close to enjoying a potential three-year rolling’ IR35 amnesty’ if we keep our nerve and help HMRC improve its new test regime.

“Keep calm and contract on”, IR35 experts tell contractors following HMRC’s new tests “Keep calm and contract on”, IR35 experts tell contractors following HMRC’s new tests

It’s IR35 business as usual for contractors – IR35 experts Andy Vessey of Qdos and Kate Cottrell of Bauer & Cottrell respond to the new HMRC tests.


  
  

Twitter

  • P35 guidance: unsure contractors should answer ‘no’ to service co question, says HMRC http://t.co/6cTwm45w

    1 hours ago

  • UK unemployment falls by 45000 in the three months to Match: ONS Labour Market Statistics: http://t.co/TirSQ6ai

    Wed, 16 May 2012

  • Manufacturers urge government to offer more support to the sector: BDO survey http://t.co/73Z9AUFz via @BBCNews

    Wed, 16 May 2012

  • No certainty from HMRC’s new IR35 framework, but the policy debate must be sustained http://t.co/idtjsXEj

    Wed, 16 May 2012

  • IR35 certainty for contractors? So close and, perhaps, not so far http://t.co/8v7LDXcI

    Tue, 15 May 2012

  • Financial sector jobs at six-month high: Morgan McKinley London Employment Monitor April 2012 http://t.co/8qbyoEje

    Mon, 14 May 2012

Follow Us On Twitter


  
     

  
  

Contractor solutions

Contractors Handbook AM Limited IR35 Test
  
Contractor accountants - pricing checklist
  

Contractor solutions

Bedouin Group

No more IR35. Retain up to 85% of your earnings.

Choice Premier Pay+

Take home up to 85% of your pay. IR35 solution.

Contractors Handbook

The expert guide for UK contractors and freelancers

InTouch Accounting

Person to person contractor accountant. Free IR35 review.

Parasol Group

Umbrella or Limited? Guidance on best options, and take home pay.

NA Bedouin Group D J Colom Accountants Contractor Financials NewsNow
  
Elevate

  

The UK's leading contractor site. Independently audited traffic (ABC) – 156,346 monthly unique visitors.