Contractor Doctor: Can my agency charge a £5,000 penalty for early termination?

IR35 Test

Dear Contractor Doctor,

I’m four years into a five-year contract with a UK agency. I’ve recently been offered a new contract that better suits my personal circumstances, and so gave the agency a month’s notice.

However, the agency has come back to me saying that I have a three month notice period and that if I fail to work the full three months, I am in breach of contract. They also say there is a penalty clause that will require me to pay the agency £5,000 for the breach.

Is a penalty clause in my agency contract legal?

Thanks

Lou

Contractor Doctor says:

“Assuming the contract is governed by English law, this penalty clause would not be enforceable,” explains Roger Sinclair of contractor legal specialist Egos. “Under English law, a contractual provision which places a party in terrorem will generally amount to an unlawful penalty, and so be unenforceable.”

According to Sinclair, that legal term means to intimidate, or frighten, a party to a contract into complying, and runs counter to general principles of contract law.

“The agency has offered no basis on which the amount of the penalty might reasonably be justified,” continues Sinclair, “so a court would be unlikely to enforce clause because it has the appearance of being a penalty, which would unjustly enrich the agency; it would not be a genuine assessment of the innocent party’s loss.”

This penalty does not qualify as damages – it is a bonus

“When one party to a contract is in breach, the injured party can expect damages to put them into the position that they would have been, in had the breach not occurred,” says Sinclair. “But a penalty clause such as the one affecting contractor Lou clearly does not fall into this category.”

As Sinclair explains, if the agency attempted to enforce the penalty clause in Lou’s contract in court, they would probably not succeed: “The agency has provided no basis for the amount of the penalty and it seems to me that it would, in the eyes of a court, appear as if the agency was seeking a bonus from the breach of contract, which is not allowable under English law.

“As the contract is worded, the penalty of £5,000 remains the same no matter how much or little notice the contractor gives,” he adds, “which distances the provision from being capable of being a genuine attempt to pre-assess of the agency’s damages.”

There is nothing wrong with the three-month termination clause, nor with the agency seeking damages for breach of contract, but the courts won’t allow the party seeking damages to secure a bonus as a result of the breach.

A genuine assessment of loss can be enforced

Contractual provisions which are intended, in the event of a breach by one party, to give the other a sum which can reasonably be regarded as a genuine attempt to pre-assess the loss that party might suffer can be enforced, says Sinclair: “If the parties enter into a contract and there is a clause providing for payment of a sum which is genuine pre-estimate of loss in the event of a breach, then that clause can be enforced.

Contractors concerned about a penalty clause in their client or agency contract should seek professional advice to determine whether it is likely to be enforceable, should a breach occur

Roger Sinclair, Egos

“In Lou’s case, if the agency had said in this provision ‘our margin is £100 per day, and for each day you fail to work of the notice period you will pay us £100’ then that would probably be enforceable, because the basis for it is a genuine pre-assessment of the loss the agency would be likely to suffer in the event of early termination and breach of contract.”

Similarly, if the agency has provided some other simple and realistic formula to calculate its losses in the event of a breach, then that could would be upheld by a court, and the contractor would have to pay.

“The courts are frequently asked to determine whether a clause providing for payment from one party to the other in the event of breach is an unlawful penalty, or a genuine pre-assessment of loss,” says Sinclair. “Contractors concerned about a penalty clause in their client or agency contract should seek professional advice to determine whether it is likely to be enforceable, should a breach occur. If it appears the provision is an attempt to intimidate them into not breaching the contract, then it may well be unenforceable.”

Good luck with your contracting!

Contractor Doctor

Published: Wednesday, August 24, 2011

© 2012 All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited. Please see our copyright notice. If you want to use any content you have seen on this site then please request our media pack and ask for details of our Content Licencing Service.


Readers Comments...


  
Bookmark and Share
  
     
  

Latest Site Updates

P35 guidance: unsure contractors should answer ‘no’ to service co question, says HMRC P35 guidance: unsure contractors should answer ‘no’ to service co question, says HMRC

Contractors are not legally obliged to answer the P35 question 6, ‘Are you a Service Company?’, and if they’re unsure should answer ‘no’.

No certainty from HMRC’s new IR35 framework, but the policy debate must be sustained No certainty from HMRC’s new IR35 framework, but the policy debate must be sustained

No certainty for limited company contractors yet, but the policy debate is far from over, say OTS Tax Director John Whiting and PCG’s Simon McVicker.

IR35 certainty for contractors? So close and, perhaps, not so far IR35 certainty for contractors? So close and, perhaps, not so far

Contractors are very close to enjoying a potential three-year rolling’ IR35 amnesty’ if we keep our nerve and help HMRC improve its new test regime.

“Keep calm and contract on”, IR35 experts tell contractors following HMRC’s new tests “Keep calm and contract on”, IR35 experts tell contractors following HMRC’s new tests

It’s IR35 business as usual for contractors – IR35 experts Andy Vessey of Qdos and Kate Cottrell of Bauer & Cottrell respond to the new HMRC tests.


  
  

Twitter

  • P35 guidance: unsure contractors should answer ‘no’ to service co question, says HMRC http://t.co/6cTwm45w

    1 hours ago

  • UK unemployment falls by 45000 in the three months to Match: ONS Labour Market Statistics: http://t.co/TirSQ6ai

    Wed, 16 May 2012

  • Manufacturers urge government to offer more support to the sector: BDO survey http://t.co/73Z9AUFz via @BBCNews

    Wed, 16 May 2012

  • No certainty from HMRC’s new IR35 framework, but the policy debate must be sustained http://t.co/idtjsXEj

    Wed, 16 May 2012

  • IR35 certainty for contractors? So close and, perhaps, not so far http://t.co/8v7LDXcI

    Tue, 15 May 2012

  • Financial sector jobs at six-month high: Morgan McKinley London Employment Monitor April 2012 http://t.co/8qbyoEje

    Mon, 14 May 2012

Follow Us On Twitter


  
     

  
  

Contractor solutions

Contractors Handbook AM Limited IR35 Test
  
Contractor accountants - pricing checklist
  

Contractor solutions

Bedouin Group

No more IR35. Retain up to 85% of your earnings.

Choice Premier Pay+

Take home up to 85% of your pay. IR35 solution.

Contractors Handbook

The expert guide for UK contractors and freelancers

InTouch Accounting

Person to person contractor accountant. Free IR35 review.

Parasol Group

Umbrella or Limited? Guidance on best options, and take home pay.

NA Bedouin Group D J Colom Accountants Contractor Financials NewsNow
  
Elevate

  

The UK's leading contractor site. Independently audited traffic (ABC) – 156,346 monthly unique visitors.