Contractor Doctor: Does contracting for different clients at the same location affect the 24 month rule?

InTouch Accounting

Dear Contractor Doctor

I have a question about the 24 month rule. I work in a building that has three companies:

  • Company A is my client, which I will be contracting with for just under 24 months
  • Company B is a facilities management company supporting IT infrastructure for company A
  • Company C is simply renting office space and totally unrelated to companies A and B.

If, at the end of my contract with company A, I got a contract with either company B or company C, would my 24 month rule be ‘reset’?

Many thanks

Darren

Contractor Doctor says:

The 24 month expense rule is quite clear when it states that a contractor may only deduct travel expenses for a given contract for so long as the contractor knows that the contract will last less than 24 months.

If the contractor renews the contract with client A, which will take the contractor to over 24 months, then travel expenses cannot be claimed. If the contractor changes department but is still working for client A, and that contract extends beyond 24 months, then the contractor cannot claim travel expenses, even if they are in a different office in the same building.

But a different client…

However, according to David Colom of contractor affairs specialist D J Colom, “If the contractor started a contract with another client that was totally separate from the original client yet in a different location within the building, there is nothing contrary in the rules to suggest that the 24 month rule could not be reset.”

So, in this case, if the contractor

  • Worked 23 months for client A
  • Won a contract with client C
  • And client C has no relationship whatsoever with client A, apart from sharing office premises
  • And the contractor is working in a different office or room in client C’s part of the building,

then the contractor would not be returning to work in the same part of the office building as they had worked in for client A.

In this case the 24-month rule would be reset and, as Colom explains: “We would be able to present a strong argument to HMRC that this was a totally separate contract and therefore not subject to the original 24-month rule.”

The contractor would therefore be able to continue to claim travel expenses and subsistence when working at this location as long as the contract was with client C, and there was no expectation that the contract would last for longer than 24 months.

We would be able to present a strong argument to HMRC that this was a totally separate contract and therefore not subject to the original 24-month rule

David Colom, D J Colom

But what about client B?

Client B is based in the same building as client A and manages client A’s IT infrastructure. There is a clear relationship between clients A and B and this relationship is, in fact, in the very operational area in which the contractor will be working.

The contractor could even find themselves returning to work on occasion in the same offices used when working for client A and working alongside employees and other contractors working for client A.

   
David Colom

David Colom

Principal

D J Colom & Co Chartered Accountants

David Colom qualified as a Chartered Accountant in the City of London in 1981 and is the founder and principal of D J Colom & Co Chartered Accountants established in 1989.

Started specialising in serving IT contractors in 1993 and is now one of the longest standing suoppliers of accountancy services to computer contractors. Read Full Profile...

View all our experts

   

In this case, it is unlikely that HMRC would accept the argument that this is a new contract and the 24 month expenses rule would apply. As soon as the original 23 month contract was completed with client A, and a new contract started with client B, the contractor would be unable to claim for travel expenses and subsistence.

Good luck with your contracting!

Contractor Doctor

Published: Friday, September 26, 2008

© 2012 All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited. Please see our copyright notice. If you want to use any content you have seen on this site then please request our media pack and ask for details of our Content Licencing Service.


Readers Comments...


  
Bookmark and Share
  
     
  

Latest Site Updates

P35 guidance: unsure contractors should answer ‘no’ to service co question, says HMRC P35 guidance: unsure contractors should answer ‘no’ to service co question, says HMRC

Contractors are not legally obliged to answer the P35 question 6, ‘Are you a Service Company?’, and if they’re unsure should answer ‘no’.

No certainty from HMRC’s new IR35 framework, but the policy debate must be sustained No certainty from HMRC’s new IR35 framework, but the policy debate must be sustained

No certainty for limited company contractors yet, but the policy debate is far from over, say OTS Tax Director John Whiting and PCG’s Simon McVicker.

IR35 certainty for contractors? So close and, perhaps, not so far IR35 certainty for contractors? So close and, perhaps, not so far

Contractors are very close to enjoying a potential three-year rolling’ IR35 amnesty’ if we keep our nerve and help HMRC improve its new test regime.

“Keep calm and contract on”, IR35 experts tell contractors following HMRC’s new tests “Keep calm and contract on”, IR35 experts tell contractors following HMRC’s new tests

It’s IR35 business as usual for contractors – IR35 experts Andy Vessey of Qdos and Kate Cottrell of Bauer & Cottrell respond to the new HMRC tests.


  
  

Twitter

  • P35 guidance: unsure contractors should answer ‘no’ to service co question, says HMRC http://t.co/6cTwm45w

    1 hours ago

  • UK unemployment falls by 45000 in the three months to Match: ONS Labour Market Statistics: http://t.co/TirSQ6ai

    Wed, 16 May 2012

  • Manufacturers urge government to offer more support to the sector: BDO survey http://t.co/73Z9AUFz via @BBCNews

    Wed, 16 May 2012

  • No certainty from HMRC’s new IR35 framework, but the policy debate must be sustained http://t.co/idtjsXEj

    Wed, 16 May 2012

  • IR35 certainty for contractors? So close and, perhaps, not so far http://t.co/8v7LDXcI

    Tue, 15 May 2012

  • Financial sector jobs at six-month high: Morgan McKinley London Employment Monitor April 2012 http://t.co/8qbyoEje

    Mon, 14 May 2012

Follow Us On Twitter


  
     

  
  

Contractor solutions

Contractors Handbook AM Limited IR35 Test
  
Contractor accountants - pricing checklist
  

Contractor solutions

Bedouin Group

No more IR35. Retain up to 85% of your earnings.

Choice Premier Pay+

Take home up to 85% of your pay. IR35 solution.

Contractors Handbook

The expert guide for UK contractors and freelancers

InTouch Accounting

Person to person contractor accountant. Free IR35 review.

Parasol Group

Umbrella or Limited? Guidance on best options, and take home pay.

NA Bedouin Group D J Colom Accountants Contractor Financials NewsNow
  
Elevate

  

The UK's leading contractor site. Independently audited traffic (ABC) – 156,346 monthly unique visitors.